军师联盟

曝曼联报价1.35亿求购德甲飞翼！其有儿萨梦，但利物浦更可能引进_我的网站

一 |     WASHINGTON -- With the growing popularity of disposable e-cigarettes, communities across the U.S. are confronting a new vaping problem: how to safely get rid of millions of small, battery-powered devices that are considered hazardous waste.For years, the debate surrounding vaping largely centered on its risks for high school and middle school students enticed by flavors like gummy bear, lemonade and watermelon.But the recent shift toward e-cigarettes that can’t be refilled has created a new environmental dilemma. The devices, which contain nicotine, lithium and other metals, cannot be reused or recycled. Under federal environmental law, they also aren’t supposed to go in the trash.U.S. teens and adults are buying roughly 12 million disposable vapes per month. With little federal guidance, local officials are finding their own ways to dispose of e-cigarettes collected from schools, colleges, vape shops and other sites.“We are in a really weird regulatory place where there is no legal place to put these and yet we know, every year, tens of millions of disposables are thrown in the trash,” said Yogi Hale Hendlin, a health and environmental researcher at the University of California, San Francisco.In late August, sanitation workers in Monroe County, New York, packed more than 5,500 brightly colored e-cigarettes into 55-gallon steel drums for transport. Their destination? A giant, industrial waste incinerator in northern Arkansas, where they would be melted down.Sending 350 pounds of vapes across the country to be burned into ash may not sound environmentally friendly. But local officials say it’s the only way to keep the nicotine-filled devices out of sewers, waterways and landfills, where their lithium batteries can catch fire.“These are very insidious devices,” said Michael Garland, who directs the county’s environmental services. “They’re a fire risk and they’re certainly an environmental contaminant if not managed properly.”Elsewhere, the disposal process has become both costly and complicated. In New York City, for example, officials are seizing hundreds of thousands of banned vapes from local stores and spending about 85 cents each for disposal.HAZARDOUS WASTEVaping critics say the industry has skirted responsibility for the environmental impact of its products, while federal regulators have failed to force changes that could make vaping components easier to recycle or less wasteful.Among the possible changes: standards requiring that e-cigarettes be reusable or forcing manufacturers to fund collection and recycling programs. New York, California and several other states have so-called extended product responsibility laws for computers and other electronics. But those laws don't cover vaping products and there are no comparable federal requirements for any industry.Environmental Protection Agency rules for hazardous waste don’t apply to households, meaning it's legal for someone to throw e-cigarettes in the garbage at home. But most businesses, schools and government facilities are subject to EPA standards in how they handle harmful chemicals like nicotine, which the EPA considers an “acute hazardous waste," because it can be poisonous at high levels.In the U.S., the push to manage disposable e-cigarettes has chiefly come from schools, which can face stricter regulation if they generate more than a few pounds of hazardous waste per month. Monroe County schools pay $60 to dispose of each one-gallon container of vapes. More than two thirds of the e-cigarettes collected by the county come from schools.“Our schools were very relieved because they had confiscated so much of this material,” Garland said. “If you think of all the high schools across the country, they are in a very difficult place right now.”Lithium in e-cigarette batteries is the same highly sought metal used to power electric vehicles and cellphones. But the quantities used in vaping devices are too small to warrant salvage. And nearly all disposable e-cigarette batteries are soldered into the device, making it impractical to separate them for recycling.Disposable e-cigarettes currently account for about 53% of the multi-billion U.S. vaping market, according to U.S. government figures, more than doubling since 2020.Their rise is a study in unintended consequences.In early 2020, the Food and Drug Administration banned nearly all flavors from reusable e-cigarettes like Juul, the cartridge-based device blamed for sparking a nationwide surge in underage vaping. But the policy didn't apply to disposables, opening the door to thousands of new varieties of fruit and candy-flavored vapes, almost all manufactured in China.In recent months the FDA has begun trying to block imports of several leading disposable brands, including Elf Bar and Esco Bar. Regulators consider them all illegal, but they have been unable to stop their entry to the U.S. and the devices are now ubiquitous in convenience stores, gas stations and other shops. FDA’s tobacco chief, Brian King, said in a statement that his agency “will continue to carefully consider the potential environmental impacts” of vaping products.THE COST OF CONFISCATING DISPOSABLE E-CIGARETTESIn 2020, New York City outlawed the vast majority of e-cigarette types, banning flavors that can appeal to youngsters.City employees conduct thousands of inspections annually, and last year issued more than 2,400 citations to corner stores and bodegas selling illegal flavored products. Adding to the challenge are THC vapes sold at hundreds of unlicensed marijuana shops, a separate but related problem that has mushroomed since New York's legalization of recreational pot.Since last November, officials have seized more than 449,000 vape units, according to city figures. New York City is spending about $1,400 to destroy each container of 1,200 confiscated vapes, but many more remain in city storage lockers. “I don’t think anyone ever considered the volume of these in our community,” said New York Sheriff Anthony Miranda, who leads a task force on the issue. “There’s a tremendous amount of resources going into this effort.” A recent lawsuit against four large vaping distributors aims to recoup some of the city's costs. For now, New Yorkers who vape can bring their used e-cigarettes to city-sponsored waste-collection events.Ultimately those vapes meet a familiar fate: They are shipped to Gum Springs, Arkansas, to be incinerated by Veolia, an international waste management firm. The company has incinerated more than 1.6 million pounds of vaping waste in recent years, mostly unsold inventory or discontinued products.Veolia executives say burning e-cigarettes' lithium batteries can damage their incinerators.“Ideally we don’t want to incinerate them because it has to be done very, very slowly. But if have to, we will,” said Bob Cappadona, who leads the company’s environmental services division.Veolia also handles e-cigarettes from Boulder County, Colorado, one of the only U.S. jurisdictions that actively tries to recycle e-cigarette batteries and components.Historically, Boulder has had one of the highest teen vaping rates in the country, peaking at nearly 33% in 2017. “It was like someone flicked the switch. Suddenly e-cigarettes were everywhere,” said Daniel Ryan, principal of Centaurus High School. Beginning in 2019, county officials began distributing bins to schools for confiscated or discarded e-cigarettes. Last year, they collected 3,500. County staffers sort the devices by type, separating those with removable batteries for recycling. Disposables are packed and shipped to Veolia's incinerator. Shelly Fuller, who directs the program, says managing vape waste has gotten more costly and labor intensive with the shift to disposables.“I kind of miss the days when we had Juuls and I could take each battery out and recycle them very easily,” Fuller said. “No one has time to dismantle a thousand Esco Bars.”___AP video journalist Joseph Frederick contributed to this story from New York___Follow Matthew Perrone on Twitter: @AP_FDAwriter___The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science and Educational Media Group. The AP is solely responsible for all content.。    

曼联再次与荷兰前锋哈维·西蒙斯（Xavi Simons）联系在一起，西班牙「Fichajes转会网」报道称，红魔欲以1.35亿欧元向其效力的德甲莱比锡红牛求购，这一数字将远远超过俱乐部队史1亿欧元的最高引援纪录。

二 |

如果莱比锡接受曼联的报价，他们将获得5500万欧元的利润。本赛季，他们用5000万欧元从巴黎圣日耳曼买断了西蒙斯，加上浮动条款最高可达8000万欧元。

当然，此事目前还纯属传闻，曼联确实需要西蒙斯这样的球员，荷兰国脚本赛季参与了16个进球（10球6助攻），能够胜任多个进攻位置，阿莫林想要这样充满活力的全面前锋。

三 |

21岁的西蒙斯也可能愿意踢英超，但他的最大梦想还是重返巴萨。「我还是个年轻球员，我有很多梦想，俱乐部也知道。」西蒙斯说，「但现在对我来说，最重要的是在接下来的比赛中打好比赛。

四 | 然后我们还要参加国际比赛，之后的问题我们再观望一下。」

据西班牙《世界体育报》报道，西蒙斯的内心似乎仍然眷恋着青训时期效力的巴萨。他在2010年至2019年期间，曾在著名的拉玛西亚青训学院效力近10年，他从未掩饰过自己对巴萨的热爱。

五 |

不过，巴萨没钱，意大利转会专家法布里齐奥·罗马诺表示，西蒙斯转会英超联赛的可能性更大，因为那里对他感兴趣的球队不只是曼联。这名球员也与利物浦联系在一起，阿森纳和切尔西本赛季也对其进行了考察。

只不过，1.35亿欧元的报价传闻完全令人无法相信。

六 | 这一说法恐怕就像上周奥斯梅恩同意64万欧元周薪加盟曼联一样，更像是球员经纪人的「抬价」手段。

利物浦更可能得到西蒙斯，如果他们真正采取行动的话。红牛全球足球主管恰是前利物浦主帅克洛普，后者希望削减莱比锡1700万英镑的工资预算。罗马诺认为，6400万英镑足以签下他。

七 |

罗马诺解释道：「正如几周前报道的那样，哈维·西蒙斯计划在夏季转会。

八 | 英超俱乐部被告知，他们是西蒙斯最有可能的目的地，大约7500万欧元的转会费足以说服莱比锡。西蒙斯梦想有一天能为巴萨效力，但这个夏天不太可能。」

曼联夏窗确实想要引进一名中锋和一名10号位的球员，除了西蒙斯，还有许多球员也是阿莫林的潜在引进目标，例如狼队10号库尼亚和南安普顿边锋泰勒·迪布林（Tyler Dibling）。其中，19岁的迪布林传闻被标价1亿英镑！

对于这一传闻，迪布林周末1-1战平西汉姆联后公开进行了回应：「兰博（拉姆斯代尔）很喜欢这些传闻，每次我在训练中射门没打正，他都会高喊：『9000万英镑！8000万英镑！』他把我的身价一千万一千万调低，这很有趣。还有人给我起了一些绰号，都是开玩笑而已，没人当真。

九 | 这只是传闻中的数字，看着玩就好。」

提及转会曼联的传闻，迪布林表示：「我不会去想这些，只是每天努力训练，努力付出，尽我所能。总而言之，我爱南安普顿，我从8岁起就在这里。这是一支非常棒的球队，我正在努力和他们一起卷土重来。没有人想成为联赛历史上最差的球队，我不想，队里也没人想，所以我们现在的目标就是拿一分是一分，再多拿几分，这样我们就不会被冠以最差英超球队的头衔。

十 |

Current article:http://ci82awd.loukachunwenghongchuikui.shop/pqtwe/tj95.html

Published on:18:44:07